<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modify mortgage or file Chapter 13 bankruptcy?</title>
	<link>http://jessica.mortgagefit.com/2009/05/09/modifyloan-chapter13/</link>
	<description>Just another Mortgagefit.com weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: parviz eftekhari</title>
		<link>http://jessica.mortgagefit.com/2009/05/09/modifyloan-chapter13/#comment-31427</link>
		<dc:creator>parviz eftekhari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jessica.mortgagefit.com/2009/05/09/modifyloan-chapter13/#comment-31427</guid>
		<description>let's say the upside down amount for the main mortgage is $100,000. In this case there are two options. The first option is to let the bank to foreclose. The second option is to include the payments for the $100,000 in the mortgage payments.
Why should not be able to do a compromise. Say Bank reduces the debt by $60,000 and the debtor pays the other $40,000 in cash from his/her IRA or borrowing from family members. I think this should work for both.
Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s say the upside down amount for the main mortgage is $100,000. In this case there are two options. The first option is to let the bank to foreclose. The second option is to include the payments for the $100,000 in the mortgage payments.<br />
Why should not be able to do a compromise. Say Bank reduces the debt by $60,000 and the debtor pays the other $40,000 in cash from his/her IRA or borrowing from family members. I think this should work for both.<br />
Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
